Original Rights & Treason Material

February 14, 2015

Joe asked for this so I thought I would post it as it is hard to find. All Rights & Treason material is copyright by Sam A. Mustafa.

Basic Rule Notes: Rights-and-Treason

Rights and Treason Charts: Rights and Treason Charts

Both of the above files are by Sam Mustafa

Advertisements

Fast Play Grande Armee version 1.2

February 14, 2015

Since I posted my latest version of Fast Play “Rights & Treason”, I thought I would also post my latest version of Fast Play Grande Armee. It is based on the original version of Fast Play Grande Armee by Sam Mustafa, but I have also included aspects of Might & Reason that I liked better. It seemed to me that Might & Reason was in many ways the next step forward in the Fast Play Grande Armee system, so it only seemed logical that the improvements from Might & Reason could be melded with Fast Play Grande Armee.

You can get my FPGA v 1.2 charts here: Napoleonic Charts v 1.2


Fast Play Rights & Treason (Fast Play Grande Armee) Version 1.3

February 10, 2015

In some recent comments, I mentioned my attempt to do a Fast Play Grande Armee set of charts for the American Civil War. Looking at my blog, I realized that I had not posted the updated version of the charts. They are loosely based on Sam Mustafa’s Rights & Treason variant for Might & Reason and his Fast Play Grande Armee rules. If you have the Fast Play Grande Armee rules, you can work out the charts. I think that with some of the campaign rule ideas from Blucher, I can actually make the Napoleonic Fast Play Grande Armee rules and my Fast Play Rights & Treason rules work for a campaign (more on that later).

Here is the third version of the rules: ACW Charts v 1.3 16 gun


Fast Play Rights & Treason

August 17, 2013

I’ve been thinking about my two games of Fast Play Rights & Treason (based on Sam Mustafa’s Fast Play Grande Armee). I had originally made artillery stands 12 guns or 6 guns. This left all artillery units with 1 SP, which tended to make them very fragile (one hit after saves and they were gone). Also that scale produced a lot of artillery stands. Reading through the ideas of some influential Union artillery officers (http://web.archive.org/web/20080207181323/http://www.usregulars.com/IFA/IFA_intro.htm) I realized that I needed larger artillery units to be on the same scale footing as infantry and cavalry brigades. Because of that I opted for 16 gun artillery stands (battalions) (which have 2 SP) and the occasional 6-8 gun artillery stands (batteries) (1 SP). That works out well as a 16 gun artillery stand is equal to a historical Confederate artillery battalion or one half of a Union artillery brigade. Having 2 SP also makes artillery battalion stands far less fragile.

Here are the new charts/QRS I’ve created to go with this scale: ACW Charts v 1.2 16 gun

Here is an example OB for Gettysburg which shows how this would work in practise: FPGA Gettysburg OB Basic 16 gun

Here is an example OB for Shiloh: FPGA Shiloh OB Basic 16 gun

I have left these files a Word files so you can change anything you would like to. I know the commander ratings are pretty subjective and you might have your own ideas about the abilities of various generals.

Now I have to figure out if I want to use 5/12s size bases or rebase my figures to 1/2 size bases, which would look better and be less fiddly, but be a lot of work.


Fast Play Grande Armee meets Rights & Treason

August 15, 2013

I’ve been trying to get my wargame mojo back recently. It seemed like most of the games I have played recently or the rules I have read just left me bored. The one exception were the American Revolution games with Piquet. I really enjoyed the Cowpens scenario that I played solo with Piquet. I liked it so much that I’ve decided the I’ll use the original Piquet for my more tactical games (1 unit = 1 battalion sort of thing). I also love the Two Hour Wargames skirmish rules like Nuts!, so the Two Hour Wargame rules will be my system for skirmish games (1 figure = 1 person). That left the void of what to play for grand tactical games (1 unit = 1 brigade). I have played a lot of Volley & Bayonet in the past, but the lack of command and control rules sort of left them lacking for me. I also find the skirmisher stands in regiment scale games a bit fiddly, especially for the Napoleonic era. That encouraged me to look at some other rules.

I have had a copy of Sam Mustafa’s Grande Armee since it came out. However, it came out when my second child was born and I didn’t really have the time to do much with it. I reread those rules a few days ago and I think they are a very good set of rules, but maybe a bit more involved than I am looking for right now. I also have a copy of Sam’s Fast Play Grande Armee rules. I really liked how they read, but I didn’t have anything based for them, so I’d have to put some work into getting something ready for them. Then it hit me, I have a large number of stands based for the American Civil War (originally for Volley & Bayonet) that I could use, but I’d first need to revise the charts to make it work for the American Civil War.

Once upon a time, Sam posted a draft set of rules for the American Civil War based on Might and Reason. He called those rules, Rights and Treason. They were good, but were two base units like Might and Reason. I thought why couldn’t I mesh Rights and Treason and some things from Might and Reason with Fast Play Grande Armee to come up with a set of rules that had what I was looking for. I’ve played Might and Reason before with Mark. I liked it; Mark seemed to like it less than I did. So I did some “kit bashing” and came up with my own version of Fast Play Rights and Treason (with some parts of both Fast Play Grande Armee and Might and Reason).

I tried two trial games. The Confederates were led by R.E. Lee and had three infantry corps (each of six infantry brigades and three artillery units) and one cavalry division with three cavalry brigades and a horse artillery unit. The Union were led by U.S. Grant and had four infantry corps and a cavalry division (organized like the Confederate forces). Not exactly historical, but close enough for a good rules trial. I played two games over the last two days. The first was more a meeting engagement and the second had the Union attacking the Confederates. I used 8mm Adlers mounted on 1.25″ square bases for infantry and cavalry and .75″ square bases for artillery.  Each infantry brigade/base represented about 2000 men, the cavalry brigades/bases represented about 1200 men, and the artillery bases represented 12 gun units.  I played both games solo on a 4′ x 4′ table with measurements reduced by 5/12s (that is 12 regular inches are 5 inches on the table). That produced a battlefield with a lot of depth and lots of room for maneuver; the same size as a full scale 9′ x 9′ table.

After two games, my evaluation is I really like these rules. They are mostly Fast Play Grande Armee with the combat procedure from Might and Reason and some modifications from Rights and Treason. I was able to play both games to a conclusion (army break) in about three and a half hours, and that included some time looking things up in the various rules and deciding which rules to use from Grande Armee or Might and Resaons. Both games flowed well, really seemed like grand tactical Civil War battles, and were fun. The rules are not for the micro-manager type of player. In both games, I had corps commanders decide to attack the enemy at inopportune times, but then that was historical. I also like the 6″ rule from Grande Armee as sometimes brigades attacked when you didn’t want them to and sometimes they didn’t attack when you wanted them to.

I need to do some more playtests, but I think the rules worked well, produced historical results, and were fun to play. Most battles could be played in 4-6 hours or less, which is what I’m looking for. The command and control rules also really worked well. I did give the army commanders one more die to roll for Command Dice than normal and that seemed to work better too. I also liked that the fiddly bits like skirmish stands and division commanders in corps were not there. Those two things had originally made me not like Grande Armee, but after playing two games I can see how those two points really speed up games with no loss in historical results. Now I just need to rebase some Napoleonic figures so I can try my modified Fast Play Grande Armee rules as well. Sort of sad that Sam Mustafa has abandoned Fast Play Grande Armee as they are really great rules.

You can get a copy of Fast Play Grande Armee here: http://www.deepfriedhappymice.com/html/gw_ga_fastplay.html

Here are the charts I used for my Fast Play Rights and Treason: ACW Charts v 1.1

Here are my untested charts for my revised version of Fast Play Grande Armee: Napoleonic Charts v 1.1

Sorry I don’t have any game pictures, but I couldn’t find my wife’s camera at 11 pm.