Games Played (catching-up) Lion Rampant

January 7, 2018

The last couple of months have been busy ones. I managed to get the flu for two weeks and then recover only to get the flu again for another three weeks. Then there was the normally busy end of semester and final exam week that is part of my job as a college professor. I did managed to get in a few games in November and December.

In November, Ian (Mr. Warflag) ran a second Franco-Prussian War game using Field Field of Battle (2nd edition). This time he made large bases so that the brigades were on a single base much like Volley and Bayonet bases. I think this worked much better for a large game as it allowed the players to more quickly move their units. Again, the Piquet Field of Battle system worked for larger battles. Each unit was a brigade rather than a battle. Ian made the revised scales, which seemed to capture the larger scale well. I think I took pictures of the game, but I can’t seem to find them!

In December, my son and I played a game of Song of Blades and Heroes. It was my second game and my son’s first game with these rules. We played an ancient Roman and German game. I had six Romans versus my son’s ten Germans. Each side was roughly 400 points. I thought the game worked well and captured the back and forth nature of hand to hand combat. The game took about two hours, which was short to me, I played a lot of 12 hour long wargames back in the 1980s and 1990s, but my son felt the game went on a bit too long. We will try a zombie game using the similar Fear and Faith rules later his January. Again, no pictures as we just wanted to play the game.

Also in November, I played in Ian’s Lion Rampant game. The game was set in a mythical King Arthur era. Arthur and his Christian allies had to help some monks escape from the advancing Saxons. There were about 9-10 units per side with three players per side. The game was fun, but we could have clearly read the rules more before the game. In the end, Arthur failed, the Saxons were able to fight their way to the monks and kill a few of them, with the rest retreating to their monastery. It was a fun game, and the rules seem very well thought out. Ian and some of the other players took a few pictures and they are below:

Figures were provided by Ian and Jeff. The game was played on Ian’s excellent terrain. Photos by Ian and Jim. My son (the young guy in the hoodie) was able to join us and enjoyed the game.

 

Advertisements

Franco-Prussian with Piquet Field of Battle

September 10, 2017

Today I went over to my friend Ian’s house for a game of Piquet Field of Battle. Ian is best know to wargamers as Mr. Warflag (http://www.warflag.com/). We played a fictional border battle with the French and Prussians and allies fighting over the strategically important town of Potzdorf. Potzdorf is the (fictional) greatest brewery in all of Europe and lies between between France and Prussia’s German allies. The goal for both sides was to gain control of the Potzdorf Brewery. In this fictional scenario, the Duchy (?) of Potzdorf was allied with the Prussians.

We used Piquet Field of Battle with the modification that units represented regiments or brigades of about 2000 infantry rather than battalions. Ian had made some modifications to the charts and weapons ranges to make it all work. And I thought those changes did work well. There were a few house rules used, but about 95% of the game was Piquet Field of Battle rules as written. In the game the French had a corps with 4 infantry divisions, an artillery division, a cavalry division and a guard brigade. I was on the French side so I’m not sure of what the Prussians and allies had, but it seemed like their force was roughly the same size as ours with a bit more cavalry. The Prussian side started with mostly minor German forces (Bavarian and Wurttemberg) plus a small Potzdorf division. There was a larger Prussian force on the way as reinforcements, but the battle ended before they reached the battlefield. Likewise, the French Guard Division was never engaged as it was posted to block the Prussian reinforcements.

I had not used the Piquet Field of Battle rules for some time as had two of the other players, only Ian had read the 2nd edition of the rules. Having said that, the game went pretty smoothly with only a few time outs to read the rules. The first turn was very long and bloody. The next two turns ended quickly with doubles being rolled on the initiative rolls. By the start of the fourth turn, both sides were out of Army Morale Points. Eventually, the Prussian and allied side had to make an Army Morale roll. Unfortunately for them, their commander was rated as a d8 and failed his Army Morale roll with a 1 (the opposed role was a 2!).

I didn’t keep a detailed log of the battle, but it was very bloody like a real Franco-Prussian War battle.

Here are some pictures from the game:

The overall game table (click to enlarge):

French Infantry:

French Cavalry:

The French Commander:

Prussian-German-Potzdorf Forces:

The Potzdorf Brewery:

A very cool windmill that I need to find out where I can get one:

Some action scenes:

Best of all was the lunch that Ian provided that included home made pork pies and beer from his actual brewery. I ate half of one of these and had enough “savory” to last me through next week, but it was exceptionally tasty.

So thanks to Ian for running this game.


December 2012 Game: Piquet Field of Battle Cowpens 1781

February 3, 2013

Last December Mark and I were able to get together to fight the battle of Cowpens (1781) from the American Revolution. We used Piquet: Field of Battle (first edition) with a few modifications. Given that we have an entire day to play, we were able to play the game twice. Sadly, both games did not turn out that well. Simply put, I found that the rules did not produce the game I was interested in playing. The twin horrors of triple moves (which I have come to hate) and the lack of sufficient Army Morale Points produced two games that left me feeling let down by the rules.

The biggest problem in both games was insufficient Army Morale Points, which determine when a side breaks and thus ends the game. We found that if either side took minor casualties and then pulled back or halted and reformed, they we reach their army break point very quickly. The problem is that the rules give you an average of 1 Army Morale Point per unit (which normally have 4 Unit Integrity Points). So if you took 25% casualties (Unit Integrity Points) and then stopped and reformed and recovered all lost UIs, your army would still have reached its breaking point, which is what happened in both games.  It seemed rather silly to see an entire intact army (all UI lost rallied) have to withdraw.

I compared Piquet Field of Battle with the original Piquet rules, which also used an Army Point System and found that the original rules had twice as many Army Points per unit. In the original Piquet rules, you could not recover lost stands, which meant when your army was liable to break, you had lost 25-35% of your stands. We never found battles ending with a force having all of its original stands on the table, but that wasn’t the case with Piquet: Field of Battle. This issue and the silly triple moves were a rule breaker for me. I have now decided to retire my Piquet: Field of Battle rules to the pile of rules I used to use.

Both games started with fairly aggressive British attacks which broke one or two of the American lines (there were three), but in each case, the British side quickly reached their Army Morale Point total and eventually had to retire (failed check on the Army Morale Card). In both cases, the British forces had very few casualties on the table as they had rallied most of their lost UIs, but as they reached their Army Morale total, they had to check Army Morale, which is not the easiest thing to pass.

Not great games, and we will be trying out the Battle of Cowpens with a different set of Rules (Die Kriegskunst modified for the American Revolution) in March. Hopefully those rules will produce a more historical and realistic result.

That said, here are some pictures from the two games. All figures are mine, the table and lunch were provided by Mark. Figures are all 15mm and included figures from Old Glory, Blue Moon, Minifigs, Polly Oliver and Frontier.

Initial Set Up:

Initial set up

The British Advance:

The British Advance

First Shots Fired:

Initial Shots fired

American Militia (Old Glory 15mm):

American Militia

British Legion Dragoons (Polly Oliver 15mm)

British Legion Dragoons

British Legion (Dragoons are Polly Oliver 15mm and the Legion Infantry, actually Queen’s Rangers stand-ins for the British Legion Infantry, are Frontier 15mm)

British Legion in Action

British 7th Regiment of Foot (Old Glory 15mm)

7th ROF

American Riflemen in action with retreating Militia (Riflemen are Blue Moon 15mm and the Militia are Minifigs 15mm)

American Riflemen with militia in retreat

The British Reach the Continental Lights (Maryland/Delaware Light Battalion)

British Reach the Continental Line

British 71st Highlanders attacking American Riflemen (both Blue Moon 15mm)

Close Combat

Tarleton (Frei Korps 15mm) and the end of the 7th ROF (Old Glory 15mm)

Tarleton and the end of the 7th ROF

Me pondering why Piquet: Field of Battle is turning out to be such a bust (for both games):

Me pondering


Cowpens (1781) for Piquet Field of Battle

November 11, 2012

Next Saturday, Mark and I are planning on playing the American Revolution battle of Cowpens (1781) with Piquet Field of Battle (1st edition). I’ve got all the figures painted and based, so I took some time to revise the scenario. If you are interested, here it is: Cowpens FOB


Ramillies with Piquet Field of Battle

September 4, 2011

Today I was able to play another Piquet Field of Battle game. Ian Croxall of warflag (http://www.warflag.com/blenheim2004/) fame hosted a refight of one wing of Ramilles. We had 4 players per side and we used a few of Ian’s variants for the War of Spanish Succession. One of the notable changes was that we omitted brigade commanders and only used division and higher commanders. The reason for this was this half of the battle had about 70 units per side, which at first looked huge. Ian and another player had play tested the scenario before hand and assured us that it would work with so many units. I was a bit surprised that the rules did work with so many units per side and the omission of the brigade commanders. I did find that with so many units there was a lot of player fatigue by the end of the game, however, we were able to play the game to a conclusion, with a French defeat in about seven hours. All in all it was a good gaming experience and I hope Ian runs more games in the future (he’s in a band now and that takes up most of his hobby time).

I didn’t bring a camera (as I can barely use one) and no one else took any pictures, but here is a picture from one of Ian’s playtests of Ramillies with his convention set of rules:

My favorite unit was this funky Allied light gun mounted on a wagon: